In this gripping and emotional narrative, we uncover the harrowing testimony of Sister Aisha — a devout Muslimah whose life was turned upside down by a secret marriage with one of the most prominent da’wah figures today, Mohammed Hijab. What began as a trust in spiritual leadership turned into emotional manipulation, betrayal, and abandonment.

Sister Aisha courageously details how promises of love and protection were used as a facade for a hidden relationship devoid of marital rights or dignity. Her testimony forces us to confront the disturbing realities that can lurk behind religious authority.

This video is not about gossip or sensationalism. It’s about accountability. It’s about standing with the unheard, the betrayed, and those crushed by the silence of the very institutions meant to protect them. Hijab’s denials, threats, and intimidation tactics are laid bare — and so too is our responsibility as an ummah.

If you’ve ever asked, “Where are the safeguards when power is misused in the name of Islam?” — this story demands your attention.
Watch it fully. Share it widely. Demand accountability. And most of all, reflect deeply.

This page outlines the serious allegations made by Sister Aisha against Mohammed Hijab, a prominent and renowned Islamic speaker. According to her testimony and corroborating messages, she was manipulated into a secretive marriage where she was denied her rights, subjected to psychological abuse, and then slandered when she tried to seek help. Her case raises grave concerns about abuse of authority by influential Islamic public figures, the power dynamics that propagate harm, and the lack of accountability amongst our leaders.

Sister Aisha is a Muslim woman who was actively involved in da’wah work for many years. Her relationship with Mohammed Hijab began through Islamic community channels and evolved into a polygynous marriage. She agreed to temporarily meeting at a hotel, until she moved out of her current residence (due to the proximity of his family). However, Hijab reneged on his commitments, imposed permanent secrecy & hotel meetups, and altered the nature of the marriage in ways that deeply violated her trust.

• Hijab proposed a polygynous marriage
• He refused to show his face to her father or meet him in person, instead providing a representative (wakīl) and anonymous witnesses.
• After the nikkah, Hijab insisted the marriage remain secret and be limited to occasional hotel meetings.
• Aisha was unaware of the witnesses’ identities and later struggled to verify the validity of the marriage.

• Hijab refused to provide financial maintenance, stating she did not explicitly request it before the nikkah.
• He denied her a marital residence, refused to engage with her family, and avoided his duty to partake in her daughter’s upbringing.
• He made it clear he would not have children with her, saying, “Don’t worry, I will not impregnate you.”

• Repeated cycles of pursuit and emotional withdrawal left Aisha confused, emotionally unstable, and mentally drained.
• He consistently invalidated her feelings, belittled her as “desperate” and “a weirdo,” and dismissed her concerns as disrespectful.
• He pressured her to keep the marriage secret and to apologize for confiding in scholars.

• Hijab justified his behavior by claiming it aligned with Shari’āh, saying that giving mahr and having two witnesses absolved him of further marital responsibilities.
• He claimed it was Islamically acceptable to make contractually unenforceable promises before marriage, then disregard them afterward.
• He insisted that keeping the marriage secret, denying contact with in-laws, and withholding financial support were all Islamically permissible.

• When confronted or questioned, Hijab threatened Aisha with humiliation and accused her of lying.
• He warned her not to “go to war” with him and dismissed her trauma by accusing her of trying to ruin his reputation.
• He later threatened others who had knowledge of their marriage, including a well-known shaykh, with legal and personal retaliation.

• Hijab completely denied the marriage, referring to Aisha as a stalker and someone he had rejected.
• He claimed she fabricated the entire narrative out of jealousy or obsession.
• Despite overwhelming textual evidence and scholarly testimony, he insisted there was no legitimate marriage and threatened defamation lawsuits.

• When Aisha’s advocates attempted to contact the witnesses of the marriage, all refused to speak out due to fear of retaliation.
• Hijab and his team demanded credentials and threatened legal action against those investigating the case.

This PDF contains a series of WhatsApp messages exchanged between Mohammed Hijab and Sister Aisha, providing direct and undeniable proof of their secret nikkah. The content includes discussions of marital matters, disputes, emotional exchanges, and references to their relationship that cannot be explained outside the context of a marriage.

If Mohammed Hijab continues to publicly deny ever being married to this sister, we call upon him to take a formal oath (mubāhala) before Allāh, swearing that no such marriage — public or secret—ever took place.

Note: These messages span across different time periods and are not part of a single day’s conversation, which is why there may be visible gaps in the timestamps.

This case reveals a calculated effort to use religious authority to exploit, silence, and discredit a vulnerable woman who entered marriage in good faith. It calls into question the unchecked power of public figures and underscores the need for transparency, community oversight, and justice.

If proven true, these actions are not just unethical — they constitute clear violations of Islamic marital jurisprudence, emotional abuse, and public defamation.

• For Community Members: Demand institutional reform to prevent spiritual abuse and exploitation.

• For Leaders and Institutions: Uphold the trust placed in your positions by ensuring ethical and professional conduct, while adhering to the Shari’āh in all public and private matters.

• For Islamic Organizations: Establish oversight boards and clear protocols for addressing misconduct.